109 Crash Landing @ LA Pad (redux)

New Message Alert

Author: Karma ran over dogma guy Date: 11/15/2020 6:52:01 PM +0/-1 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

Agreed on an anti torque issue. But let me pragmatically ask this; can you speculate on the chances or odds of the tail rotor failing at that exact moment of extreme vulnerability?

Reply Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread Rules of Engagement Terms of Use

109 Crash Landing @ LA Pad (redux) +2/-0 Been around a while 11/15/2020 6:05:43 PM

109 Crash Landing @ LA Pad (redux) +0/-1 Karma ran over dogma guy 11/15/2020 6:52:01 PM

109 Crash Landing @ LA Pad (redux) +3/-1 P.T. Moore 11/15/2020 6:57:34 PM

109 Crash Landing @ LA Pad (redux) +1/-1 A109 pilot 11/15/2020 7:04:36 PM

109 Crash Landing @ LA Pad (redux) +3/-1 just because it's 11/15/2020 7:56:11 PM

109 Crash Landing @ LA Pad (redux) +0/-1 A109 pilot 11/15/2020 9:14:07 PM

OP is management trying to keep a hospital contract. (NT) +1/-1 Kiss that contract good bye. 11/16/2020 12:13:01 PM

Don't most mechanical failures occur when (NT) +1/-0 item is near maximum use ?? 11/15/2020 7:04:31 PM

No. Applying left pedal will not cause the T/R drive system (NT) +0/-7 to fail. 11/15/2020 7:57:26 PM

No. Applying left pedal will not cause the T/R drive system +4/-0 Dingus 11/16/2020 12:13:38 AM

Their own company mechs said LTE. I’ll go with that as well. (NT) +0/-0 Mechs love to talk. 11/16/2020 12:10:02 PM

Their own company mechs said LTE. I’ll go with that as well. (NT) +0/-1 Mechs are stupid 11/18/2020 2:01:15 PM

Their own company mechs said LTE. I’ll go with that as well. +0/-0 Walk a few 11/29/2020 6:55:36 PM

109 Crash Landing @ LA Pad (redux) +1/-0 Simple 11/18/2020 1:35:01 AM

T/R Fail more than likely +1/-0 An Army Guy 11/18/2020 6:13:29 PM

sound of crickets from Leonardo, failure (NT) +0/-0 unlikely, that leaves? 11/19/2020 12:06:35 AM