|
Also the same people that eliminated small pox (NT)
|
|
|
Author: and polio...just sayin. Date:
2/14/2023 2:42:28 PM +1/-0
Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or
In New Window
|
|
|
Reply
Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread
Rules of Engagement
Terms of Use |
|
|
Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67
+5/-1 Up and up, all ARBITARY criteria! 2/11/2023 8:26:05 PM
Meant to link this:
+0/-0 Bill in the Senate 2/11/2023 8:26:49 PM
Let's try again:
+0/-0 Anonymous 2/11/2023 8:28:15 PM
Look, a real medical journal study showing age limitations based on age are
+4/-1 nothing but pure age discrimination! 2/11/2023 9:08:25 PM
Another real study: Conclusion, age factor was insignificant!
+4/-1 Show me the science union man! 2/11/2023 9:15:25 PM
Oh look, even more real science! Age is not a factor!
+3/-1 (unless you're trying to blow smoke) 2/11/2023 9:24:39 PM
Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67
+1/-2 ChatGPT trainer 2/12/2023 12:55:28 AM
Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67
+8/-2 Depends 2/12/2023 10:16:09 AM
We get it, you’re old! Should have made better choices if you (NT)
+3/-2 HAVE to still work., 2/12/2023 11:11:20 AM
Once age 65 and 59 or less
+2/-0 PT121 2/12/2023 12:53:47 PM
freedom is an illusion
+0/-2 Anonymous 2/13/2023 10:34:52 AM
Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67
+0/-0 cheap 2/15/2023 8:51:12 AM
Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67
+0/-0 Lop sided Sid 2/16/2023 5:34:19 AM
|