|
Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67
|
|
|
Author: ChatGPT trainer Date:
2/12/2023 12:55:28 AM +1/-2
Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or
In New Window
|
Stay calm, we are busy training the AI. Soon, this problem will be solved as soon as we perfect the AI pilot. We are still in early stages. As soon as figure out the ghost breaking and the windshield wiper issue, all will be good, no need for human pilot.
sincerely,
ChatGPT |
|
Reply
Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread
Rules of Engagement
Terms of Use |
|
|
Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67
+5/-1 Up and up, all ARBITARY criteria! 2/11/2023 8:26:05 PM
Meant to link this:
+0/-0 Bill in the Senate 2/11/2023 8:26:49 PM
Let's try again:
+0/-0 Anonymous 2/11/2023 8:28:15 PM
Look, a real medical journal study showing age limitations based on age are
+4/-1 nothing but pure age discrimination! 2/11/2023 9:08:25 PM
Another real study: Conclusion, age factor was insignificant!
+4/-1 Show me the science union man! 2/11/2023 9:15:25 PM
Oh look, even more real science! Age is not a factor!
+3/-1 (unless you're trying to blow smoke) 2/11/2023 9:24:39 PM
Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67
+1/-2 ChatGPT trainer 2/12/2023 12:55:28 AM
Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67
+8/-2 Depends 2/12/2023 10:16:09 AM
We get it, you’re old! Should have made better choices if you (NT)
+3/-2 HAVE to still work., 2/12/2023 11:11:20 AM
Once age 65 and 59 or less
+2/-0 PT121 2/12/2023 12:53:47 PM
freedom is an illusion
+0/-2 Anonymous 2/13/2023 10:34:52 AM
Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67
+0/-0 cheap 2/15/2023 8:51:12 AM
Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67
+0/-0 Lop sided Sid 2/16/2023 5:34:19 AM
|