Click here to close
New Message Alert
correct, but under (c), you can exceed it in the (NT)
correct, but under (c), you can exceed it in the (NT)
Author:
24 hour window
Date:
10/11/2021 6:31:18 PM
+0
/
-0
Show Orig. Msg (this window)
Or
In New Window
Reply
Return-To-Index
Display Full Msg Thread
Rules of Engagement
Terms of Use
One more time: FAR 135.267(c) is NOT applicable
+0
/
-2
to 99% of HAA operations! 10/11/2021 11:48:03 AM
One more time: FAR 135.267(c) is NOT applicable
+3
/
-0
Hmmm.... 10/11/2021 12:13:36 PM
One more time: FAR 135.267(c) is NOT applicable
+0
/
-2
To 99% Of HAA Operations 10/11/2021 12:21:59 PM
One more time: FAR 135.267(c) is NOT applicable
+0
/
-5
You nerds 10/11/2021 1:10:08 PM
Four Weeks!! If your schedule changes day to night inside of a 4 week
+0
/
-4
period, you CANNOT use 135.267(c) 10/11/2021 1:56:40 PM
FAR 135.267(c) is NOT applicable
+0
/
-0
GetReal 10/11/2021 2:13:37 PM
FAR 135.267(c) is NOT applicable
+0
/
-0
(b) Just limits The Amount Of 10/11/2021 2:28:39 PM
not quite right.
+0
/
-0
Anonymous 10/11/2021 3:53:12 PM
Youi realize that (b) is the foundation for (d).
+0
/
-0
(b) and (d) are paired together 10/11/2021 3:14:05 PM
There is absolutely no reason for an HAA operator to use (c) anyway
+0
/
-0
None at all! 10/11/2021 3:32:16 PM
I incorrectly said increases from 8 hrs to 10rs, but I meant
+1
/
-0
from 8 hrs to 16 hrs. 10/11/2021 4:19:54 PM
I incorrectly said increases from 8 hrs to 10rs, but I meant
+0
/
-0
You Can Amass 8 Hours Of Flying 10/11/2021 4:54:31 PM
correct, but under (c), you can exceed it in the (NT)
+0
/
-0
24 hour window 10/11/2021 6:31:18 PM
correct, but under (c), you can exceed it in the
+0
/
-0
You Cannot Exceed It Without 10/11/2021 7:04:48 PM
One more time: FAR 135.267(c) is NOT applicable
+0
/
-0
cheap 10/11/2021 8:01:09 PM
One more time: FAR 135.267(c) is NOT applicable
+2
/
-0
In other 10/11/2021 9:07:51 PM
On-call is duty, so itncan be regularly assigned under (c) (NT)
+1
/
-1
Anonymous 10/12/2021 6:03:40 AM
On-call is duty, so itncan be regularly assigned under (c)
+1
/
-1
True 10/12/2021 10:45:22 PM
On-call is duty, so itncan be regularly assigned under (c)
+2
/
-0
Anonymous 10/13/2021 2:37:17 PM
On-call is duty, so itncan be regularly assigned under (c)
+0
/
-0
Yeup 10/13/2021 4:18:25 PM
On-call is duty, so itncan be regularly assigned under (c)
+0
/
-0
Duh! 10/13/2021 9:33:34 AM
On-call is duty, so itncan be regularly assigned under (c)
+0
/
-0
That’s 10/26/2021 7:11:12 PM
On-call is duty, so itncan be regularly assigned under (c)
+0
/
-0
That’s 10/26/2021 7:11:44 PM
On-call is duty, so itncan be regularly assigned under (c)
+0
/
-0
That Is Why The Letters From 10/26/2021 7:26:12 PM