Click here to close

New Message Alert

FSDO's don't stamp design approvals for Part 27 (NT)

FSDO's don't stamp design approvals for Part 27 (NT)

Author: Anonymous Date: 11/4/2024 3:08:05 PM +3/-0 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

Return-To-Index Display Full Msg Thread

The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell +12/-2 Why it’s junk 11/4/2024 2:44:25 PM

FSDO's don't stamp design approvals for Part 27 (NT) +3/-0 Anonymous 11/4/2024 3:08:05 PM

FSDO's don't stamp design approvals for Part 27 +1/-7 No kidding 11/4/2024 3:46:48 PM

FAA's responsible for type certifying all aircraft! +1/-1 But, not some FSDO lackey! 11/4/2024 4:03:59 PM

Cessna's aren't helicopters! MU-2 needs one. +0/-1 You need an endorsement to fly a 11/4/2024 4:48:16 PM

Cessna's aren't helicopters! MU-2 needs one. +1/-0 True 11/12/2024 10:00:22 AM

Every semi-rigid MRB system is prone to mast bumping and ALL are prone to (NT) +0/-1 blade/tailrotor contact. 11/4/2024 3:40:51 PM

Not in the inherent way the Robinson is +2/-2 Susceptibility 11/4/2024 3:45:18 PM

And, you seem to be incoherent to know that it is a perfectly fine design +5/-0 when it stay's within it's envelope 11/4/2024 4:10:32 PM

How many wings fell off of Cessna 150s??? +1/-1 Primary trainer 11/4/2024 4:24:16 PM

But, there are LOTS of fatal accidents where pilot error was cited +0/-1 Besides, your comparison is dishonest 11/4/2024 5:11:01 PM

But, there are LOTS of fatal accidents where pilot error was cited +0/-1 Lived to Tell 11/4/2024 9:38:08 PM

But, there are LOTS of fatal accidents where pilot error was cited +0/-1 Anonymous 11/4/2024 11:33:27 PM

But, there are LOTS of fatal accidents where pilot error was cited

+0/-1 Lived to Tell 11/5/2024 12:31:54 PM

There are three types of MR heads. A Bell and a Robinson (NT) +0/-0 are in the same type: Semi-rigid 11/4/2024 4:12:25 PM

There are three types of MR heads. A Bell and a Robinson +1/-2 the bell ain't got no 11/4/2024 4:19:21 PM

Because the blades flex more (NT) +0/-1 Anonymous 11/4/2024 4:37:18 PM

The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell +2/-3 You know what's interesting? 11/4/2024 5:58:23 PM

The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell +1/-3 You need educated 11/5/2024 12:34:25 AM

The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell +0/-1 are you an aerospace engineer, if not 11/4/2024 6:09:52 PM

Yes it is. It's not rigid. It's not fully-articulating. (NT) +0/-1 So, it's semi-rigid. 11/4/2024 6:42:57 PM

Yes it is. It's not rigid. It's not fully-articulating. +0/-1 love it when the student pilots 11/4/2024 7:54:29 PM

love it when you wrong about everything (NT) +0/-1 Anonymous 11/4/2024 9:16:27 PM

Love it when "experts" turn out to be shown up (NT) +0/-1 Anonymous 11/4/2024 10:44:34 PM

Oops, you are right... NOT +0/-0 Anonymous 11/4/2024 9:42:19 PM

That's a conning hinge genius (NT) +0/-2 a doy 11/4/2024 6:52:57 PM

That's a conning hinge genius +1/-1 Nope not exactly 11/5/2024 5:31:14 PM

That's a conning hinge genius +0/-1 Yea 11/6/2024 9:43:40 AM

That's a conning hinge genius +0/-1 Try again genius 11/6/2024 11:46:08 AM

That's a conning hinge genius +1/-1 Put down your purse… 11/7/2024 12:45:15 AM

The Robinson is not a semi rigid like Bell +1/-0 Semi rigid like Bell? 11/17/2024 10:08:27 AM