We get it, you’re old! Should have made better choices if you (NT)

New Message Alert

Author: HAVE to still work., Date: 2/12/2023 11:11:20 AM +3/-2 Show Orig. Msg (this window) Or In New Window

Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67 +5/-1 Up and up, all ARBITARY criteria! 2/11/2023 8:26:05 PM

Meant to link this: +0/-0 Bill in the Senate 2/11/2023 8:26:49 PM

Let's try again: +0/-0 Anonymous 2/11/2023 8:28:15 PM

Look, a real medical journal study showing age limitations based on age are +4/-1 nothing but pure age discrimination! 2/11/2023 9:08:25 PM

Also the same people that eliminated small pox (NT) +1/-0 and polio...just sayin. 2/14/2023 2:42:28 PM

Another real study: Conclusion, age factor was insignificant! +4/-1 Show me the science union man! 2/11/2023 9:15:25 PM

Oh look, even more real science! Age is not a factor! +3/-1 (unless you're trying to blow smoke) 2/11/2023 9:24:39 PM

Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67 +1/-2 ChatGPT trainer 2/12/2023 12:55:28 AM

Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67 +8/-2 Depends 2/12/2023 10:16:09 AM

We get it, you’re old! Should have made better choices if you (NT) +3/-2 HAVE to still work., 2/12/2023 11:11:20 AM

Once age 65 and 59 or less +2/-0 PT121 2/12/2023 12:53:47 PM

for international ops, not domestic. which is why ALPA opposes it +0/-2 (their thinking b4 vast shortages) 2/13/2023 8:44:45 AM

freedom is an illusion +0/-2 Anonymous 2/13/2023 10:34:52 AM

freedom is an illusion +1/-0 it could be said that it's a relative 2/14/2023 10:38:19 AM

Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67 +0/-0 cheap 2/15/2023 8:51:12 AM

Once age 60, then 65, proposed 67 +0/-0 Lop sided Sid 2/16/2023 5:34:19 AM