Click here to close
New Message Alert
This doesn’t look good for this program
This doesn’t look good for this program
Author:
...
Date:
1/27/2022 1:15:40 AM
+0
/
-1
Show Orig. Msg (this window)
Or
In New Window
That would be 388 hours per year
Return-To-Index
Display Full Msg Thread
This doesn’t look good for this program
+3
/
-2
New York Bell 429 crash update 1/26/2022 12:02:56 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+3
/
-1
how this happens 1/26/2022 12:08:05 PM
Clearly this is on that pilot. But there are always contributing factors
+11
/
-2
With their environment 1/26/2022 12:11:26 PM
Clearly this is on that pilot. But there are always contributing factors
+0
/
-2
he didn't 1/26/2022 12:18:19 PM
He or she checked every box of what not to do (NT)
+2
/
-1
Shouldn’t even have a license 1/26/2022 12:25:11 PM
He or she checked every box of what not to do
+0
/
-2
accidents happen 1/26/2022 12:40:20 PM
No, they don’t “just” happen. Especially in this accident.
+2
/
-1
Don’t fool yourself. 1/26/2022 12:43:59 PM
No, they don’t “just” happen. Especially in this accident.
+1
/
-3
oh boy 1/26/2022 12:46:07 PM
No, they don’t “just” happen. Especially in this accident.
+0
/
-2
I didn't read the part 1/26/2022 12:47:24 PM
Apparently flying around with scattered clouds about
+0
/
-0
is IMC to this guy 1/26/2022 12:57:25 PM
Why don’t you check the weather at KGBQ for the time he set up for an
+0
/
-1
IFR “practice” approach. His words 1/26/2022 1:14:59 PM
KGVQ (NT)
+0
/
-0
Correction. Still LIFR at the time 1/26/2022 1:15:48 PM
Why don’t you check the weather at KGBQ for the time he set up for an
+2
/
-0
olderendirt 1/27/2022 8:35:32 AM
Is it really an “accident” if the pilot knowingly
+0
/
-0
tuse 1/27/2022 7:53:12 AM
Clearly this is on that pilot. But there are always contributing factors
+0
/
-0
he didn't decouple 1/26/2022 5:41:47 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0
/
-7
say wut 1/26/2022 12:44:26 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program (NT)
+1
/
-0
Better than the pilot reading the RFM 1/26/2022 12:45:38 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+5
/
-1
Dude said 1/26/2022 12:47:50 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0
/
-2
true. crashing is not a good look 1/26/2022 1:24:33 PM
So wrong on your perspective
+2
/
-1
Practice approach in VFR-Good 1/26/2022 1:37:48 PM
So wrong on your perspective
+0
/
-1
nobody said he wasn't at fault 1/26/2022 1:45:52 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+2
/
-1
LOL 1/26/2022 1:48:57 PM
I thought they had BK’s and Agustas at this place (NT)
+0
/
-0
Where they get 429s 1/26/2022 1:55:08 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0
/
-1
That’s normal flying 1/26/2022 2:25:49 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0
/
-0
Yea 1/26/2022 8:36:42 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0
/
-1
... 1/27/2022 1:15:40 AM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0
/
-1
Dumb 1/27/2022 11:16:32 AM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0
/
-1
let me help you 1/26/2022 3:58:38 PM
Actually by his statements, the crew statements, and the weather
+2
/
-1
me (with furrowed brow and 1/26/2022 4:40:39 PM
Actually by his statements, the crew statements, and the weather
+0
/
-0
interesting that 1/26/2022 4:49:21 PM
Actually by his statements, the crew statements, and the weather
+0
/
-0
huh 1/26/2022 5:54:57 PM
Pilot states I seen the fog. Pilot continues into it.
+4
/
-0
olderendirt 1/27/2022 8:37:17 AM
30 years of flying and only (NT)
+2
/
-0
3,000+ hours?!?!?!?! 1/27/2022 12:44:11 AM
30 years of flying and only
+0
/
-3
some people quit flying and 1/27/2022 9:37:19 AM
The 'average' annual flight time in HEMS is about 150 hrs annually.
+0
/
-0
olderendirt 1/27/2022 10:11:44 AM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0
/
-1
Yeah, 1/27/2022 6:38:05 AM
How in the heck did the NTSB classify this as a PART 91 flight?
+0
/
-1
NTSB is useless to get anything right 1/27/2022 8:27:04 AM
better link:
+0
/
-0
Anonymous 1/27/2022 8:28:18 AM
How in the heck did the NTSB classify this as a PART 91 flight?
+0
/
-1
olderendirt 1/27/2022 8:39:28 AM
NOPE, not with medical crewmembers aboard (NT)
+0
/
-1
(or patients). Part 135!! 1/27/2022 9:02:44 AM
NOPE, not with medical crewmembers aboard (NT)
+0
/
-0
here we go 1/27/2022 9:18:38 AM
Are the medical crew "flight crew"? With specific responsibilities in the
+0
/
-0
olderendirt 1/27/2022 10:04:21 AM
No, they are medical crewmembers! Flight crewmembers are (NT)
+0
/
-1
Pilot, Copilot, Engineer, Navigator 1/27/2022 10:16:36 AM
"No, they are medical crewmembers!" Ooops, my bad. You are correct. Medical
+0
/
-0
olderendirt 1/27/2022 11:40:37 AM
"No, they are medical crewmembers!" Ooops, my bad. You are correct. Medical
+3
/
-0
14CFR Part 1 1/27/2022 1:13:38 PM
But the wear jackets embroidered with FlightCrew (NT)
+0
/
-0
and tell everyone they are FlightCrew 1/27/2022 2:41:51 PM
"No, they are medical crewmembers!" Ooops, my bad. You are correct. Medical
+3
/
-0
Haa pilot 1/31/2022 7:22:10 PM
Rnav approach error
+4
/
-0
anony 1/27/2022 10:25:56 AM
Rnav approach error
+1
/
-0
Biggest 1/27/2022 3:31:59 PM
Rnav approach error
+3
/
-0
Ifrgiy 1/27/2022 7:57:14 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0
/
-0
FLY BOY 1/28/2022 3:32:29 PM
Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can" (NT)
+0
/
-0
olderendirt 1/28/2022 3:56:11 PM
Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can"
+1
/
-2
we've all heard that a million times 1/28/2022 5:07:01 PM
Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can"
+1
/
-0
You didn’t hear it even once. 1/28/2022 5:14:23 PM
Bob Hoover said: "Fly the aircraft as far into the crash as you can"
+0
/
-1
well biffster 1/28/2022 6:00:59 PM
George Carlin Said: "If black boxes survive air crashes -- why don't they (NT)
+3
/
-0
make the whole plane out of the stuff?" 1/28/2022 5:46:21 PM
This doesn’t look good for this program
+0
/
-0
No 1/31/2022 6:21:03 PM
+4/-0 anony 1/27/2022 10:25:56 AM